<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Postal Employee Mistakes 101</title>
	<atom:link href="http://postalbenefitsgroup.net/postal-news/postal-employee-mistakes-101/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://postalbenefitsgroup.net/postal-news/postal-employee-mistakes-101/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2021 22:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: represso</title>
		<link>https://postalbenefitsgroup.net/postal-news/postal-employee-mistakes-101/#comment-1311</link>
		<dc:creator>represso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jan 2014 20:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http:/?p=1#comment-1311</guid>
		<description>With a delayed annuity would you lose your right to health care benifits?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With a delayed annuity would you lose your right to health care benifits?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Babs</title>
		<link>https://postalbenefitsgroup.net/postal-news/postal-employee-mistakes-101/#comment-1310</link>
		<dc:creator>Babs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2013 19:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http:/?p=1#comment-1310</guid>
		<description>If I retire before I am 62, yet meet MRA, and could afford to wait till I am 62 to take my annuity, to avoid the 5% penalty per year prior to age of 62, would it be worth waiting? 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I retire before I am 62, yet meet MRA, and could afford to wait till I am 62 to take my annuity, to avoid the 5% penalty per year prior to age of 62, would it be worth waiting?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr WordPress</title>
		<link>https://postalbenefitsgroup.net/postal-news/postal-employee-mistakes-101/#comment-1</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr WordPress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http:/?p=1#comment-1</guid>
		<description>Hi, this is a comment.&lt;br /&gt;To delete a comment, just log in and view the post&#039;s comments. There you will have the option to edit or delete them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, this is a comment.<br />To delete a comment, just log in and view the post&#039;s comments. There you will have the option to edit or delete them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>https://postalbenefitsgroup.net/postal-news/postal-employee-mistakes-101/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 12:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http:/?p=1#comment-29</guid>
		<description>Ralph,

Because you are already 65 the $12,500 in life insurance would be free as soon as you retire.    You would never have to worry about doing anything because the Postal Service will automatically reduce the coverage and not charge you anything once you retire.  Great question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ralph,</p>
<p>Because you are already 65 the $12,500 in life insurance would be free as soon as you retire.    You would never have to worry about doing anything because the Postal Service will automatically reduce the coverage and not charge you anything once you retire.  Great question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph S</title>
		<link>https://postalbenefitsgroup.net/postal-news/postal-employee-mistakes-101/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 00:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http:/?p=1#comment-28</guid>
		<description>If already PAST that age of 65,  would keeping the 25%  or roughly $12,500 also become paid in full?  after 10 years?   Same premise as at the younger age of 55.  Would the premium be much, much higher?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If already PAST that age of 65,  would keeping the 25%  or roughly $12,500 also become paid in full?  after 10 years?   Same premise as at the younger age of 55.  Would the premium be much, much higher?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
